# PALESTINE /// Political Geography of the Gaza Strip: A Territory of Experiments for the State of Israel

Map of the Gaza Strip (Dec 2011) /// United Nations Office for the Coordination of Human Affairs in Occupied Palestinian Territory

I think that many of us are infuriated in front of the unfolding new siege over Gaza by the Israeli army. As horrifying as those images of children and entire families being  struck by the bombs sent by aircraft, battleships, drones or other remote controlled machine guns, it is extremely important to also insist on the daily oppression that the people of the Gaza strip have to face even when they are not being bombed. Since 2006 and the Israeli disengagement of its settlement within the strip, the situation is different from the one in the West Bank -which I have to say, I am more familiar with. When the West Bank has to suffer from multiple colonial apparatuses, Gaza functions pretty much as a gigantic prison from which, it is almost impossible to escape -even the Egyptian border remains close to most people. Most of the needs of its people (water, food, electricity, phone & internet networks etc.) is provided directly by Israel (for most of it, see the last map of this article) who has been, along the years, quite literally experimenting how little it could provide without provoking a severe humanitarian crisis in the eyes of the International Community. The access to the sea itself is heavily restricted – and enforced with real rockets – by the IDF to keep Gaza fishermen’s boats within a limit of three nautical miles. Needless to say, fishing cannot be a strong economy in this context.

The strip is thus a scale 1 experiment for the Israeli state to determine how to sustain the lives of 1.7 millions Palestinians – apparently more for its International reputation than for its philanthropic will as we can currently see – with the minimum of ressources. But, this very small piece of territory – and to some extents, this is also true in the West Bank – is also a terrain of experiments for military training and weapon technology. As some specialists have been detecting, some US military officials have been often spotted during IDF operations in a clear attempt to learn how to lead a siege in the Middle East. After the operation Lead Cast in Dec 2008-Jan 09 that killed more than 1,300 Palestinians of all ages, the Goldstone Report and various other testimonies have shown that white phosphorus bombs and flechette shells which are categorically banned by the International legislation. The various apparatuses of control around the Strip are also an opportunity for the Israeli army to implement new technology in matter of weapons like remote controlled machine gun stations t0 prevent the access of the ‘no-go zone’ (about 500 meters from the green line) and the ‘high risks zone (fron 500 to 1,500 meters from the green line):

Shooting at people accessing restricted areas is often carried out from remotely-controlled weapon stations. These stations are deployed in secured pillboxes every several hundred meters along the fence, each containing machine guns protected by retractable armoured covers, whose fire can reach targets up to 1.5km.30
A team of all-female soldiers act as lookout staff of the operation rooms located at the battalions’ headquarters around Gaza.31 These soldiers identify potential targets and suggest them to their battalion commanders, who authorize whether the target is “incriminated” or not, i.e. whether warning or direct fire can be opened at them.
According to a recent report from the Israeli daily Haaretz, “the procedure to authorize opening fire is complex, but takes less than two minutes”.32
Actual fire is ultimately carried out by pressing a button, which opens the pillbox dome revealing the machine gun, and operating a joystick which allows the soldier to aim the weapon toward a designated target, guided by the images relayed from the field. The operator also draws upon images and information from ground sensors, aircrafts, and overhead drones,33 and is fed with real time audio of the target being struck: “This [the sound of the shots being fired] gives you the feeling of, ‘Wow, I’ve fired now” explained one twenty-year old operator. “It’s very alluring to be the one to do this. But not everyone wants this job. It’s no simple matter to take up a joystick like that of a Sony PlayStation and kill, but ultimately it’s for defense”.34 Other military means are also used to enforce access restrictions to land, including airstrikes from unmanned drones and shooting from tanks. Ammunition used during the latter include ‘flechette’ projectiles, which explode in midair releasing thousands of 3.75 cm metal darts that disperse in a conical arch three hundred meters long and about ninety meters wide.35 During July 2010, a least 2 civilians were killed and 10 injured (including 4 children) by this type of ammunition.

31. “IDF’s newest heroes: Women spotters on Gaza border”, Anshel Pfeffer, Haaretz, 3 March 2010.
32. “Lethal Joysticks”, Anshel Pfeffer, Haaretz, 2 July 2010
33. “Automated Border”, Arieh Egozi, Ynetnews.com 6 October 2007
34. Op cite Pfeffer, 2 July 2010
35. http://www.btselem.org/english/firearms/flechette.asp

excerpt from the United Nations OCHA and Whole Food Program’s report on the humanitarian impact of Israeli-imposed restrictions on access to land and sea in the Gaza strip.

Few days ago, the IDF’s official website also issued an arrogant article on the developments of new combat weapons that “James Bond wishes he had” as their despising humor indicates.

The Gaza strip as well as the West Bank are therefore territories whose people are the subjects of military, economical and political (this is obviously not a coincidence that this new siege was declared  two months before the next legislative elections in Israel) interests, which overall are relatively independent from the ideological, historical and security-based arguments that are given by the Israeli State to justify such colonial and martial behaviors.

All following maps are done by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Human Affairs in Occupied Palestinian Territory:

10 Comments on “# PALESTINE /// Political Geography of the Gaza Strip: A Territory of Experiments for the State of Israel

  1. Pingback: # PALESTINE /// Representation of the Otherness for a Gaza kid | The Funambulist

  2. Hi Leopold,

    I’m guessing you’ve already read it, but if you haven’t Eyal Weizman’s essay Lethal Theory is deeply illuminating on this idea of Gaza being used as a proving ground for population control in all sorts of ways, tactical/operationl/strategic.

    The IDF state it themselves that they consider military ‘practice as research’ – quotes from Lethal Theory;

    “The most effective way to fight an unspecified threat is to actively contribute to producing it…[causing] the enemy to emerge from its state of potential and take actual shape…”

    “Raids are a tool of research… they provoke the enemy to reveal its organization… Most relevant intelligence is not gathered as the basis upon which attacks are conducted, but attacks become themselves modes of producing knowledge about the enemy’s system.”

    “Without a decisive result possible, the main benefit of military operation is the very improvement of the [military] system as a system.”

    http://www.skor.nl/_files/Files/OPEN18_P80-99(1).pdf

    Its becoming increasingly clear that the militaries of the West are restructuring to deal increasingly with asymmetric + urban threats. One of the last frontiers still remaining to be conquered by the military was the art of mastering urban guerrilla warfare without suffering unacceptable troop losses or inflicting heavy civilian casualties – it seems to me that the IDF is leading the way in this ‘research’ in Gaza, hence the American interest.

    What’s shocking to me is architecture’s role in all this – Weizman’s essay points out that the forefront of architectural research is being carried out in elite military academies, not universities, where critical theory from the 80’s onwards is being appropriated to give soldiers a spatial edge over insurgents. Most scarily the military see themselves as architects of sorts, engaging with the city through situationalist ideas of detournment and subversive movement. The rigidity of architecture is not an obstacle to them, with enough C4 the urban fabric becomes the liquid medium for their 3 dimensional assaults.

    I remember reading Paul Virilio a while back where he said that he was read quite seriously by the French military – I didn’t know what the significance of that was at the time, but its becoming alarmingly clear.

  3. Pingback: "Peace" in reach: Gaza Terror Tunnel Led to Israeli Town - Page 6 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

  4. Pingback: # PALESTINE /// Infrastructural and Militarized Cartography of Gaza | The Funambulist

  5. Pingback: # PALESTINE /// Invasion of Gaza: Architecture’s Violence at Work | The Funambulist

  6. Pingback: The Death Zone | geographical imaginations

  7. Pingback: # PALESTINE /// Legal Fictions and Forced Displacement: Pushing Hundreds of Thousands to the Sea | The Funambulist

  8. Pingback: Gaza, la No-go Zone « Mauro Poggi

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,415 other followers